Accepted. Triage of the findings is complete, and there are no further changes to follow (if this triage is ever overturned, this ADR should be marked Superseded and a new ADR with a new number should be started).
For テスト知識管理のGit-nativeモデル_評価レビュー.md (2026-08-13 edition, a revised version re-evaluating the response status to the initial 2026-08-12 review), each finding was judged as useful/not useful in テスト知識管理のGit-nativeモデル_評価レビュー_有用性判定と修正指示.md. The judgment criterion had two axes: whether it directly improves the accuracy/reliability/usability of the markharness tool’s functionality, behavior, or documentation (useful), or whether it only serves to satisfy a reviewer (defending novelty, the form of an empirical study) without changing the tool itself (not useful). “Not useful” does not mean the finding is factually wrong; it means it does not contribute to this project’s purpose (examining product design).
The response to items judged useful (decomposing the branch-strategy claim, a JSON Schema for executions/*/results.yml, explicitly documenting ID immutability, cleaning up the knowledge-graph representation, the related-work comparison, weakening the large-scale backfill claim) has already been reflected in the changelog of テスト知識管理のGit-nativeモデル_統合版.md (2026-08-13(3) onward), decisions/0004, and src/schema.rs/src/validate.rs.
Since the response is complete, the evaluation review body (テスト知識管理のGit-nativeモデル_評価レビュー.md), the usefulness-triage document (テスト知識管理のGit-nativeモデル_評価レビュー_有用性判定と修正指示.md), and the execution prompt collection (improvement-prompts.md; for the response to the 2026-08-12 review, items 1–6 and 11 are complete, and items 7–10 are rejected as described below) have all served their purpose, so their key points are transcribed into this decision record and the files are deleted.
derived_from is a series of diff events rather than a persistent graph is already made explicit not in the title but in the explanations in README, cli-manual.md, and the body of 統合版.md (decision 0001).improvement-prompts.md item 7): Already recorded as unimplemented in docs/README.md (former) and Chapter 7 Future Work of 統合版.md as UC8; work will not begin until a concrete request emerges.docs/テスト知識管理のGit-nativeモデル_評価レビュー.md: Findings have been reflected in this decision record (rejected items) and in the relevant sections/changelog of 統合版.md (adopted items).docs/テスト知識管理のGit-nativeモデル_評価レビュー_有用性判定と修正指示.md: Judgment criteria and rejection reasons have been transcribed into this decision record. The implementation of the corrective instructions (useful items) is recorded in the changelog of 統合版.md.docs/improvement-prompts.md: Items 1–6 and 11 are reflected in decision 0001, decision 0002, and the 統合版.md changelog. Item 8 (restructuring related work) is complete via decision 0003 and the “related-work comparison” response in this decision. Items 9 and 10 (evaluation protocol) are rejected in this decision. Item 7 (importer implementation, large-scale case study) remains not started as described above and remains in Chapter 7 Future Work of 統合版.md.